EA screener: compare independently scored Expert Advisors
Filter independently scored MT5 Expert Advisors by strategy design, risk label and score. Every row links to the full evidence-based verdict. Free, no sign-up.
Showing 11 of 11 scored Expert Advisors.
- The Gold ReaperBreakout design, Profalgo Limited (Wim Schrynemakers), MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD. Checked 2026-10-17. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskMixed59.3
- Gold SnapBreakout design, Chen Jia Qi, MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD. Checked 2026-10-21. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskMixed56.0
- Quantum TitanScalper design, Bogdan Ion Puscasu (Incredible Traders), MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD. Checked 2026-10-17. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskWeak51.0
- Dynamic Liquidity IntelligenceBreakout design, Sathit Sukhirun, MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD M15. Checked 2026-10-17. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskWeak48.5
- Waka WakaGrid design, Valeriia Mishchenko, MetaTrader 5, AUDCAD, AUDNZD, NZDCAD. Checked 2026-10-21. We sell a listing under this name.High riskWeak46.5
- Perceptrader AIGrid design, Valeriia Mishchenko, MetaTrader 5, six currency pairs on M5. Checked 2026-10-21. We sell a listing under this name.High riskWeak44.0
- Wave RiderGrid design, Adam Hrncir, MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD. Checked 2026-10-17. We sell a listing under this name.High riskWeak43.0
- Global Trade Plan EABreakout design, MeetAlgo, MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD H1. Checked 2026-10-17. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskWeak42.8
- Quantum CommanderTrend design, Bogdan Ion Puscasu, MetaTrader 5, US30. Checked 2026-10-21. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskWeak41.0
- ThunderGold ScalperScalper design, Jorge Luiz Guimaraes De Araujo Dias, MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD M15. Checked 2026-10-21. We sell a listing under this name.Medium riskAvoid for now39.0
- Quantum Queen XGrid design, Bogdan Ion Puscasu (Incredible Traders), MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD. Checked 2026-10-17. We sell a listing under this name.High riskAvoid for now36.5
How the screener works
Every Expert Advisor in this list has been read and scored by hand on the same eight criteria: verified evidence, risk behaviour, profit quality, durability, vendor transparency, practical fit, cost and support. The scores, weights and the written reason behind each one are in the published method. The screener only lets you filter and sort those verdicts. It adds no hidden ranking of its own, and a filter never changes a score.
How to use it well
Start with risk, not return. Set the risk label to Low or Medium first, then look at the score. A grid or martingale EA cannot be rated below High risk in our model, so filtering by design shows you quickly which ones depend on averaging down. Then open the verdict: the score is a summary, and the evidence behind it (the live signals, the review count, what the vendor answered to critics) is where you decide.
Things the screener will not tell you
A high score is not a buy signal and a low score is not an accusation. Scores reflect the public evidence on the day we checked, shown on each row, and they change when new evidence appears. The list is also short: we publish a verdict only after reading the sources, so it grows as fast as we can do that work, not as fast as products launch. Where we sell a listing under a reviewed name, the row says so and the verdict opens with the same disclosure.
Check the numbers yourself
For any EA that is not on this list, paste its published statistics into the EA strategy check to see its red flags, then read the EA buying checklist before you pay. To see what we sell, browse the Expert Advisor store.
This tool is general education, not financial advice. Results are estimates built from the numbers you enter, and trading carries a high level of risk.